The Appetite Of Tyranny Including Letters To An Old Garibaldian

" It will hardly be denied that there is one lingering doubt in many, who recognise unavoidable self-defence in the instant parry of the English sword, and who have no great love for the sweeping sabre of Sadowa and Sedan. That doubt is the doubt whether Russia, as compared with Prussia, is sufficiently decent and democratic to be the ally of liberal and civilised powers. I take first, therefore, this matter of civilisation.
It is vital in a discussion like this, that we should make sure we are going by meanings and not by mere words. It is not necessary in any argument to settle what a word means or ought to mean. But it is necessary in every argument to settle what we propose to mean by the word. So long as our opponent understands what is the thing of which we are talking, it does not matter to the argument whether the word is or is not the one he would have chosen.
A soldier does not say "We were ordered to go to Mechlin ; but I would rather go to Malines". He may discuss the etymology and archaeology of the difference on the march ; but the point is that he knows where to go. So long as we know what a given word is to mean in a given discussion, it does not even matter if it means something else in some other and quite distinct discussion. We have a perfect right to say that the width of a window comes to four feet ; even if we instantly and cheerfully change the subject to the larger mammals ; and say that an elephant has four feet.
The identity of the words does not matter, because there is no doubt at all about the meanings ; because nobody is likely to think of an elephant as four foot long, or of a window as having tusks and a curly trunk"